1.) not contemporaneous, and conflicts with other gospels' stories2.) not contemporaneous, and conflicts with other gospels' stories3.) not contemporaneous, and conflicts with other gospels' stories4.) not contemporaneous, and conflicts with other gospels' stories5.) Circular logic. You are using your conclusion (that jesus was a real person) to support your premise (that OT prophecies were fulfilled). That is a logical fallacy in action. Any fictional character could be penned to fulfill any previous alleged prophecy.6.) Apostles eyewitness accounts of jesus as a real person? How did they manage that with absolutely no texts dating anywhere near the alleged life of jesus?7.) Same as #6. 8.) How is the spread of christianity (and 'rapidity' is subjective, and irrelevant) indicative of a living historical jesus? The spread of christianity occurred well after the alleged life of jesus, so it would hardly attest to the veracity of your claim for a historical jesus - if jesus was a real person, he must not have been very impressive, since nobody seemed to notice he existed at the time.All your 'evidence' magically appears well after your historical christ is alleged to have lived, and none of it comes from primary sources, and much of it conflicts with itself. If you make up any other stuff off the top of your head, well, continue to make a fool of yourself.